<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>innovate big &#187; cartoon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovatebig.com/index.php/category/cartoon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovatebig.com</link>
	<description>creating something from nothing by Rod Ebrahimi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>befriend innovation not invention</title>
		<link>http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/05/11/befriend-innovation-not-invention/</link>
		<comments>http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/05/11/befriend-innovation-not-invention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rod Ebrahimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/05/11/befriend-innovation-not-invention/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Yes. That&#8217;s me&#8230; attempting a bit of innovation.)
This important yet subtle distinction is too often blurred. The success of a solution or product is largely determined by how effectively it supports a given task or solves a specific problem; not by how inventive it is. The &#8220;execution&#8221; or &#8220;how&#8221; is far more critical than the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://innovatebig.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fishing-largev1.jpg' title='rod’s gone fishing v4'><img src='http://innovatebig.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fishing-rodv4.jpg' alt='rod’s gone fishing v4' style="border-style: none" /></a><br />
(Yes. That&#8217;s me&#8230; attempting a bit of innovation.)</p>
<p>This important yet subtle distinction is too often blurred. The success of a solution or product is largely determined by how effectively it supports a given task or solves a specific problem; not by how inventive it is. The <em>&#8220;execution&#8221;</em> or <em>&#8220;how&#8221;</em> is far more critical than the <em>&#8220;what&#8221;</em> and, unfortunately, there exist few exceptions to the rule. Invention can be exciting and, at times, even revolutionary. But when haphazardly applied, invention just isn&#8217;t good enough.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s all about consistently re-working solutions around people&#8217;s needs in order to better solve problems.</p>
<p>Putting innovation before invention is when&#8230;</p>
<p><em>* Users feel understood</em> &#8211; this means religiously putting less emphasis on target audience defaults or assumptions and more emphasis on relevance and emotional impact by researching users &#8220;in the wild&#8221;. Consider <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">analytics</a> and log analysis. Explore the competition, alternative solutions and keep in constant contact with users. And consider combining these efforts with off-line (in the real-world) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnography">ethnographic research</a> to really get to know your users as people not just clicks. These insights can create remarkable results and as marketing guru <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com">Seth Godin</a> continually reminds us: &#8220;Products that are remarkable get talked about.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>* Problems are sought out and quests are embarked upon</em> &#8211; this should be done early and often. Sometimes the problem you think you are solving is very different from the problem you are really solving&#8230;so constant identification and re-identification of the problem is critical; this is at the core of both online and traditional product innovation. <a href="http://thefacebook.com">Facebook</a> and the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> have done this very well. Any problem worth solving requires that it be considered something like a mythological <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest">quest</a> to solve. Embark on a worthwhile quest and many others will join you in finding the right solution.</p>
<p><em>* Learning takes priority</em> &#8211; The Internet makes it easy to acquire second-hand innovations by learning from giant, high-traffic sites. Particularly, those sites that take user-centered and data-driven design as seriously as Google or Amazon.com. I find myself considering this often. For example, you won&#8217;t ever find me re-creating a fancy new web-based shopping cart and checkout system.</p>
<p>I love hearing from you. Do me a favor and let me know your thoughts.</p>
<p><strong>Related Posts You Might Also Enjoy:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/02/08/an-honest-business-model-innovation/">an honest business model innovation?</a><br />
<a href="http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/02/04/disruptive-innovations-will-drive-real-good/">disruptive innovations will drive &#8220;real good&#8221;</a><br />
<a href="http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2007/07/31/simple-insights-drive-innovation/">simple insights drive innovation</a></p>
<p class="fbconnect_share"><fb:share-button class="url" href="http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/05/11/befriend-innovation-not-invention/" /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://innovatebig.com/index.php/2008/05/11/befriend-innovation-not-invention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
